A Jersey roller-skating club has said it may have to fold as a result of not having a new venue to move into once it leaves leave Fort Regent.

Fort Regent has been the main sports centre in Jersey for decades, but the government has decided to close it before starting a £110 million project to regenerate the building next year.

Sports clubs will have to leave Fort Regent by the end of 2025 and the government said it would help clubs move to existing sports facilities in the island.

Empire Skating Club said it was told over the last four years it would move to Oakfield Sports Centre, but recently found out the surface there was not suitable for roller skating.

'Everything to me'

Bethany Lawrence, the club's head coach, said she felt let down by the way the situation had been handled.

Ms Lawrence said: "Over the last four years we've had the correspondence saying that they're going to support us in finding a new venue after Fort Regent closes and only in the last month or two have we been given any indication that we can't go to Oakfield because the flooring is wrong."

Ms Lawrence said it would take a lot of support from the wider community to help find a suitable venue.

She added: "This club means everything to me, it's where I spend all my spare time, it's where I see all my friends and get to teach these amazing children, the kids love it and they live it and breathe it."

Darren Dupre, assistant coach at Empire Skating Club said: "it's likely if we can't get the venue and hours that we need then we will have to fold.

"The chances of getting individual skaters up to championship level is going to be really difficult in a smaller venue, with a floor that's not suitable as well, we can change wheels but there is only so far you can go with that."

Jersey's Infrastructure minister, Andy Jehan, who also has responsibility for sport, said he was confident a solution could be found for the skating club, and said officers were meeting with the skating club regularly.

Survivors and families of those killed in an oil rig disaster 45 years ago will finally get compensation from the Norwegian state after a close vote passed in the country's parliament.

More than 120 people died, including 22 Brits, when the Alexander Kielland floating platform capsized in the North Sea oil fields on 27 March 1980.

Opposition parties in the Norwegian house, the Storting, who filed the compensation motion, said the disaster was still an "open wound" for the country which needed closing.

Among those attending the debate in Oslo were Brits Laura Fleming and Tara Pender, whose fathers died.

Ms Fleming, from Durham, previously said there were unanswered questions about the disaster, which killed her father Michael and five of his compatriots from the Cumbrian village of Cleator Moor.

The motion had been opposed by the government but passed through the Storting by 53 votes to 51, after 11 MPs engaged in a nearly hour-long debate watched by about 40 members of the Kielland Network campaign group.

Unknown/Norwegian Petroleum Museum

Exchanging tearful hugs with other members of the network, Ms Fleming said she was "ecstatic".

"It is easy to get lost in the whole battle of everything and to forget what you are fighting for, but really it's for justice and acknowledgement of what happened," Ms Fleming said.

She said the compensation was not about the money, but rather the "principle" that after 45 years of being "ignored and neglected", the majority of the Norwegian parliament was now saying "yes, we should have done better by you".

Ms Pender, from near Nottingham, was 13 when her father PJ Pender died and wore a necklace containing a piece of the rig when she went to the Storting Building in central Oslo.

She said she was "overwhelmed" with emotion and "a bit shocked".

The four-year-old platform was being used as an accommodation platform for the nearby Edda rig in the Ekofisk oil field about 200 miles (320km) off the coast from Stavanger, Norway, when one of its legs broke off during a storm.

A 1981 Norwegian inquiry attributed the disaster to a crack in one of the braces caused during its construction in France, but the manufacturers said it had not been maintained or anchored properly by its operators.

Some people received compensation at the time from the company which ran the oil rig, Phillips Petroleum, but campaigners said the Norwegian state should also accept responsibility.

A University of Stavanger study published in 2025 said families and the 89 survivors were let down by official investigations, while a 2021 review by the Norwegian auditor general found "highly reprehensible" failures to hold any of the companies involved in the disaster to account, or to support families and survivors.

The Norwegian government apologised and funded the study to assess the impact on those affected.

Merete Haslund, a leader of the Kielland Network, was 13 when her engineer father was killed on his first trip to the rig.

She said the campaign group began in 2016 to get the "whole truth", which they were still fighting for, and financial recompense for the survivors and families from the Norwegian state.

Ms Haslund said the compensation would "mean a lot to people", adding: "Very many people have been suffering not just mentally but also economically."

Ingrid Fiskaa, the foreign policy spokesperson for the Socialist Left Party and an MP for the Rogaland county which contains Stavanger, was one those putting forward the motion.

Ms Fiskaa, who was three years old when the disaster occurred, said it affected a lot of people in her region and was "still an open wound".

"What we are really hoping for is today will start the work to close that wound," she told the BBC.

She told the story of one of her constituents, a 70-year-old man who survived but suffered horrific injuries to his mouth and teeth which had seen him rack up large dental debts.

"The most important thing for him is that the state never has taken responsibility," Ms Fiskaa said, adding previous governments had "had a really hard time admitting the state has done this wrong".

Mimir Kristjansson, an MP for the Red Party representing Rogaland, said the vote was a "historic day" and the compensation was 45 years overdue.

Mr Kristjansson, whose speech sparked a round of applause from the Kielland Network members watching from the Storting's public gallery, said the disaster was an "open wound in the national memory of the oil industry".

"Oil has made Norway a very, very rich country but it has also cost a lot of lives," he told the BBC.

Unknown/Norwegian Petroleum Museum

Mr Kristjansson said a lot of people lost friends and family in the disaster and the Norwegian state had a "terrible track record of not taking care of the people we send out in very dangerous conditions to work at sea for us".

The compensation was "not just about the money" but represented a "way for the state to take responsibility" for its mistakes, he said.

Mr Kristjansson said there was a "great feeling of injustice" and the state had made "billions" while "gambling with the lives of a lot of ordinary working people".

Tonje Brenna, the Minister of Labour and Social Inclusion of Norway, said it was for the employers to pay compensation at the time, not the state.

She said the 2021 review found there was "no basis for conducting a new investigation" as the authorities had done a "thorough job of clarifying the causes of the accident", although "certain weaknesses may have contributed to weakening confidence in the investigation".

Ms Brenna said the Storting had "adopted a statement of regret for the inadequate follow-up [families of the deceased] and survivors experienced after the accident" and other work to probe the impact had been completed.

She said there was therefore "no basis for drawing other conclusions or implementing further measures".

But the win by just two votes means the Norwegian government will now have to determine a compensation settlement.